Author Archive

Nader Supports Health Savings Accounts?

In a recent article Ralph Nader attacks several critics of Obama’s health care reform proposal, including Cato:

Now enters the well-insured libertarian Cato Institute with full-page ads in the Washington Post and The New York Times charging Obama with pursuing government-run health care. A picture of Uncle Sam pointing under the headline “Your New Doctor.” Nonsense. The well-insured people at Cato should know better than to declare that this “government takeover” would “reduce health care quality.”

I agree that Cato employees are “well-insured” – a description so appropriate that Nader used it twice in a single paragraph. At Cato we have Health Savings Accounts, which are probably the closest thing to free market health insurance allowed by law.

It’s nice to see Nader, a proponent of socialized medicine, praise HSAs. But it’s unfortunate that his preferred options for health care would abolish HSAs entirely.

Brandon Arnold • July 27, 2009 @ 2:30 pm
Filed under: Government and Politics; Health, Welfare & Entitlements

  Print This Post

An Uneven Playing Field

Cato’s tax experts, Chris Edwards and Dan Mitchell, have written extensively on international tax competition. Their research shows that countries can help attract investment and spur economic growth by lowering their tax rates.

Could countries employ this same strategy to make their sports teams better?

Real Madrid, one of the most popular and successful soccer teams in the world, recently purchased the rights to two of the sport’s top players. They acquired Kaka, who was named the world’s best soccer player in 2007, from Italian powerhouse, AC Milan. And they lured Cristiano Ronaldo, the world’s top player in 2008, away from Manchester United, the reigning champions of the English Premier League.

There are a number of reasons why Kaka and Ronaldo are moving to Spain, but it’s pretty clear that taxes played a significant role. That’s because in 2005, Spain passed a tax break for foreign workers, including soccer players. This gives Spanish teams a huge advantage in bidding wars with teams from higher-tax countries like Italy and England. To make matters worse, England recently raised its top income tax rate.

“The new tax rate in England is going to make things much harder for English clubs,” noted Jonathan Barnett, a leading sports agent whose clients include Glen Johnson, Ashley Cole and Peter Crouch. “It will hinder the [English] Premier League and help the Spanish league because Spain has big tax discounts for footballers, so there’s an enormous advantage to go there. Someone like Ronaldo could be offered the same money at Real Madrid but be 25% better off.”

Similarly, a frustrated executive from AC Milan blames Kaka’s departure on the Italian tax system: “I repeat, this is all a matter of different types of taxation. If we were a Spanish club, we would have saved €40 million.”

Policymakers and soccer fans alike should take note.

Brandon Arnold • June 11, 2009 @ 4:51 pm
Filed under: International Economics and Development; Tax and Budget Policy

  Print This Post

New at Cato

For a daily email briefing of new Cato articles, events and studies, subscribe to Cato Today.

Brandon Arnold • May 27, 2009 @ 10:45 am
Filed under: General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

For the newest Cato articles, papers and television appearances, subscribe to Cato Today.

Brandon Arnold • May 13, 2009 @ 12:30 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe, here.

Brandon Arnold • May 7, 2009 @ 4:56 pm
Filed under: General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

For more content from Cato, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Brandon Arnold • May 6, 2009 @ 3:14 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New At Cato

For more commentary, visit Cato’s op-ed archive.

Brandon Arnold • May 4, 2009 @ 6:12 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

New articles, videos and Podcasts today:

Brandon Arnold • April 30, 2009 @ 5:11 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

New articles, videos and Podcasts today:

Brandon Arnold • April 29, 2009 @ 5:43 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute.

Brandon Arnold • April 28, 2009 @ 5:07 pm
Filed under: General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe, here.

Brandon Arnold • April 27, 2009 @ 5:01 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe, here.

Brandon Arnold • April 21, 2009 @ 4:46 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; Foreign Policy and National Security; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe here.

Brandon Arnold • April 20, 2009 @ 4:51 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe here.

Brandon Arnold • April 14, 2009 @ 8:06 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe here.

Brandon Arnold • April 13, 2009 @ 4:43 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe, here.

Brandon Arnold • April 9, 2009 @ 6:25 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe, here

Brandon Arnold • April 8, 2009 @ 2:44 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General; Government and Politics; Regulatory Studies; Tax and Budget Policy

  Print This Post

New at Cato (4/7/09)

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a comprehensive daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe, here

Brandon Arnold • April 7, 2009 @ 3:55 pm
Filed under: Cato Publications; General

  Print This Post

New at Cato

Here are a few highlights from Cato Today, a comprehensive daily email from the Cato Institute. You can subscribe, here.

Brandon Arnold • April 6, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
Filed under: General

  Print This Post

Republicans and Earmarks

This week, a handful of fiscally conservative Republican senators have been trying to cut earmarks out of the $410 billion omnibus appropriations bill. According to Taxpayers for Common Sense, the legislation contains 8,570 earmarks worth $7.7 billion.

Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) has sought to strike specific items, like the $200,000 earmark for Tattoo Removal Violence Prevention Outreach Program in Burbank, California and the $1.9 million earmark to the Pleasure Beach Water Taxi Service in Connecticut.

Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has taken a broader approach by introducing an amendment to strike all earmarks from the bill and revert to last year’s spending levels.

Not surprisingly, they have been unsuccessful. And given recent events, one must wonder if these efforts by fiscal conservatives are even welcomed by members of their own party.

The amendments introduced by Coburn and McCain were defeated by opposition from not only by the majority of Democratic senators, but also many Republican appropriators, like Senators Thad Cochrane (R-MS) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).

And despite his occasional anti-earmark rhetoric and support for the Coburn and McCain amendments, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is one of the chief beneficiaries of the earmark-laden omnibus bill. Reports suggest he requested either $75 or $51 million for his home state of Kentucky. Either way, he will obtain far more than his Democratic counterpart, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), whose earmark requests total $26 million.

Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has been fairly consistent in her criticism of the earmarking process and, for the most part, has voted accordingly. Proving that Republican affection for earmarking is a bicameral phenomenon, her stance attracted ire from Representative Roy Blunt (R-MO), formerly one of the highest-ranking Republicans in House, who said he “would hope that Claire would change her mind on this,” as he praised Senator Kit Bond’s (R-MO) prowess at earmarking.

Now, earmarks make up a relatively small slice of the overall budget, but as Coburn has noted, the problem with earmarks is ‘‘the hidden cost of perpetuating a culture of fiscal irresponsibility. When politicians fund pork projects they sacrifice the authority to seek cuts in any other program.”

For more on earmarks, check out the “Corporate Welfare and Earmarks” chapter of the Cato Handbook for Policymakers.

Brandon Arnold • March 5, 2009 @ 4:47 pm
Filed under: General; Government and Politics; Tax and Budget Policy

  Print This Post