- Cato @ Liberty - http://www.cato-at-liberty.org -
Help Break My Common Curriculum Fever
Posted By Neal McCluskey On March 14, 2011 @ 4:33 pm In Education and Child Policy | Comments Disabled
Over at Flypaper, Chester Finn suggests [1] that people like me are either crazy or on the verge of it for fearing that the Shanker Institute’s “common content” manifesto might very well be another step toward federal control of American education.
“Over in the more feverish corners of the blogosphere, and sometimes even in saner locales,” he writes, ”the Shanker Institute’s call for ‘common content’ curriculum to accompany the Common Core standards has triggered [2] a panic attack [3].”
Now, I wouldn’t say “panic attack.” To panic [4] is to “be overcome by a sudden fear,” but I’ve been watching the move toward federal curriculum control for some time. Back in 2008 [5] many of the groups behind the Common Core called for Washington to “incentivize” adoption of national standards. In 2009 [6], the Obama administration made adopting common standards critical to compete in the so-called Race to the Top. In 2010, the administration put common standards front-and-center in the accountability piece of its No Child Left Behind reauthorization blueprint [7]. Finally, that same year the U.S. Department of Education chose two consortia to develop national assessments [8] to go with national standards. So when I read [9] the Shanker Institute’s proposal, with its recommendation that the federal government spend taxpayer money to help implement ”purely voluntary” curriculum ”guidelines,” I didn’t panic. I saw the same obvious movement toward federal curriculum control I’d been observing for years.
But maybe I am a bit “feverish.” Maybe I do need to chillax a bit. Thankfully, I know just the thing to help me do that: National-standards fans should pronounce publicly and unequivocally — perhaps issue another manifesto! — that they do not want federal money in any way connected to common standards, and state that they will oppose any effort to “incentivize,” “support,” “cajole,” “threaten,” or do anything else to states or districts to push them to adopt common curricula. Were national-standards champions to do that – you know, just demand that all this be as purely voluntary as they say it is – and I and others like me would no doubt be well on the road to recovery.
Somehow, I don’t expect my forehead to cool off anytime soon.
Article printed from Cato @ Liberty: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org
URL to article: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/help-break-my-common-curriculum-fever/
URLs in this post:
[1] Chester Finn suggests: http://www.educationgadfly.net/flypaper/2011/03/rational-thinking-on-common-curricula/
[2] has triggered: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/not-possible-in-this-dimension/
[3] a panic attack: http://jaypgreene.com/2011/03/03/fordham-zig-zags-again/
[4] To panic: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&defl=en&q=define:panic&sa=X&ei=EXR-TbHeEe-F0QHVh6HbAw&ved=0CBQQkAE
[5] Back in 2008: http://www.achieve.org/files/BenchmarkingforSuccess.pdf
[6] In 2009: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/more-on-race-to-the-top/
[7] reauthorization blueprint: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/blueprint.pdf
[8] develop national assessments: http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-secretary-education-duncan-announces-winners-competition-improve-student-asse
[9] when I read: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/hey-national-curriculum-standardizers-stop-lying-to-us/
Click here to print.
Copyright © 2009 Cato-at-liberty. All rights reserved.