<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cato @ Liberty &#187; abortions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tag/abortions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org</link>
	<description>Cato Institute Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.cato-at-liberty.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;We&#8217;re All In This Together&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/were-all-in-this-together/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/were-all-in-this-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pilon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=30150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Roger Pilon</p>Today POLITICO Arena asks: Given that Planned Parenthood’s online donations have shot up over the last two months, is Mike Pence (R-Ind.) correct to say it could &#8212; and should &#8212; operate without taxpayer funds? My response: Given that many Americans believe that abortion is murder, of course Planned Parenthood, the nation’s leading abortion provider, [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/were-all-in-this-together/">&#8216;We&#8217;re All In This Together&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Roger Pilon</p><p>Today <a href="http://www.politico.com/arena/">POLITICO Arena</a> asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>Given that Planned Parenthood’s online donations have shot up over the last two months, is Mike Pence (R-Ind.) correct to say it could &#8212; and should &#8212; operate without taxpayer funds?</p></blockquote>
<p>My response:</p>
<p>Given that many Americans believe that abortion is murder, of course Planned Parenthood, the nation’s leading abortion provider, should not be publicly funded. (And please don’t say that no taxpayer funds go for abortions: money is fungible.)</p>
<p>Democrats think that almost everything should be publicly funded – education, health care, retirement, the arts. What’s next? News? Entertainment? Oh, I forgot: NPR and PBS. But only that programming that meets their exacting standards. FOX News? Faget about it! Where you from? Kansas? And they wonder why there’s a Tea Party.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/were-all-in-this-together/">&#8216;We&#8217;re All In This Together&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/were-all-in-this-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion Is Only the Tip of the Iceberg</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-is-only-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-is-only-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pilon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=27491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Roger Pilon</p>Today POLITICO Arena asks: Given the push by Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) to deny all federal funding to Planned Parenthood, are we seeing the revival of abortion as a major fault line in American politics? My response: Opponents of the push to deny federal funding to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers will try to inflame the debate [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-is-only-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/">Abortion Is Only the Tip of the Iceberg</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Roger Pilon</p><p>Today <a href="http://www.politico.com/arena/">POLITICO Arena</a> asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>Given the push by Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) to deny all federal funding to Planned Parenthood, are we seeing the revival of abortion as a major fault line in American politics?</p></blockquote>
<p>My response:</p>
<p>Opponents of the push to deny federal funding to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers will try to inflame the debate by characterizing the push as an attack on the Supreme Court&#8217;s discovery of a right to abortion. But the issue goes much deeper and is perfectly generalizable: it&#8217;s a push to get government out of one more controversial area of life.</p>
<p>Most modern liberals fail to grasp &#8212; or ignore &#8212; a fundamental principle of political theory, namely, that the more we do collectively, the more liberty is restricted and passions are inflamed. That&#8217;s why classical liberals asked government to provide only &#8220;public goods&#8221; like national defense, law enforcement, and clean air. Abortions are private goods (for some). Under current law, women are free to seek them from willing providers. And others are free to assist those who cannot afford an abortion. But no one should be compelled to provide or pay for another&#8217;s abortion. It&#8217;s a matter, quite simply, of freedom.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-is-only-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/">Abortion Is Only the Tip of the Iceberg</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-is-only-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ObamaCare Will Include Taxpayer-Funded Abortions</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-will-include-taxpayer-funded-abortions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-will-include-taxpayer-funded-abortions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cato Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=11911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>According to MSNBC, Democratic leaders have given up on trying to appease pro-life House Democrats: House leaders have concluded they cannot change a divisive abortion provision in President Barack Obama&#8217;s health care bill and will try to pass the sweeping legislation without the support of ardent anti-abortion Democrats.A break on abortion would remove a major [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-will-include-taxpayer-funded-abortions/">ObamaCare Will Include Taxpayer-Funded Abortions</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p><p>According to MSNBC, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35814735/ns/politics-health_care_reform/">Democratic leaders have given up on trying to appease pro-life House Democrats</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>House leaders have concluded they cannot change a divisive abortion provision in President Barack Obama&#8217;s health care bill and will try to pass the sweeping legislation without the support of ardent anti-abortion Democrats.A break on abortion would remove a major obstacle for Democratic leaders in the final throes of a yearlong effort to change health care in America. But it sets up a risky strategy of trying to round up enough Democrats to overcome, not appease, a small but possibly decisive group of Democratic lawmakers in the House&#8230;</p>
<p>Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman of California, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee&#8230;predicted some of the anti-abortion lawmakers in the party will end up voting for the overhaul anyway.</p></blockquote>
<p>Pro-life Democrats will vote for taxpayer-funded abortions?  Without even a fig leaf of a compromise?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-will-include-taxpayer-funded-abortions/">ObamaCare Will Include Taxpayer-Funded Abortions</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-will-include-taxpayer-funded-abortions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion Funding and Health Care</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-funding-and-health-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-funding-and-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states conference of catholic bishops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=10063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>President Obama&#8217;s approach to health care reform &#8212; forcing taxpayers to subsidize health insurance for tens of millions of Americans &#8212; cannot not change the status quo on abortion. Either those taxpayer dollars will fund abortions, or the restrictions necessary to prevent taxpayer funding will curtail access to private abortion coverage. There is no middle [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-funding-and-health-care/">Abortion Funding and Health Care</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p><p>President Obama&#8217;s approach to health care reform &#8212; forcing taxpayers to subsidize health insurance for tens of millions of Americans &#8212; cannot <em>not</em> change the status quo on abortion.</p>
<p>Either those taxpayer dollars will fund abortions, or the restrictions necessary to prevent taxpayer funding will curtail access to private abortion coverage. There is no middle ground.</p>
<p>Thus both sides&#8217; fears are justified. Both sides of the abortion debate are learning why government should not subsidize health care. Tip of the hat to President Obama for creating this teachable moment.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Catholics should be outraged at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (to which my grandfather served as counsel).  Yes, the USCCB helped prevent taxpayer funding of abortions in the House bill. But at the same time, those naughty bishops have abandoned the Church&#8217;s doctrine of subsidiarity by endorsing the rest of the Democrats&#8217; plan to centralize power in Washington.</p>
<p>As it happens, Caesar is the main source of funding for Catholic hospitals. That may explain why the bishops are so eager to render unto, ahem, Him.</p>
<p>Cross-posted at <a href="http://www.politico.com/arena/">Politico&#8217;s Health Care Arena.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-funding-and-health-care/">Abortion Funding and Health Care</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abortion-funding-and-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.424 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 18:28:07 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
