<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cato @ Liberty &#187; chinese communist party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tag/chinese-communist-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org</link>
	<description>Cato Institute Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.cato-at-liberty.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Sixty Years On, China Has Prosperity, Still Needs Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sixty-years-on-china-has-prosperity-still-needs-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sixty-years-on-china-has-prosperity-still-needs-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James A. Dorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese communist party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private property rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=9404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By James A. Dorn</p>China’s rise from an isolated state-controlled economy in 1949 to the world’s third largest economy with a vibrant nonstate sector is something to celebrate on the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China. Under Deng Xiaoping, China’s transition from plan to market began in earnest in December 1978. For more than [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sixty-years-on-china-has-prosperity-still-needs-freedom/">Sixty Years On, China Has Prosperity, Still Needs Freedom</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By James A. Dorn</p><p>China’s rise from an isolated state-controlled economy in 1949 to the world’s third largest economy with a vibrant nonstate sector is something to celebrate on the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China.</p>
<p>Under <a href="http://www.time.com/time/asia/2006/heroes/nb_deng.html">Deng Xiaoping</a>, China’s transition from plan to market began in earnest in December 1978. For more than 30 years now, China has gradually removed barriers to a market system and increased opportunities for voluntary exchanges. Special economic zones, the end of communal farming, the rise of township and village enterprises, and the massive increase in foreign trade have enabled millions of people to lift themselves out of abject poverty.</p>
<p>Economic freedom has increased personal freedom, but the Chinese Communist Party has no intention of giving up its monopoly on power. China’s future will depend to a large extent on the path of political reform. Further strengthening of private property rights, including land rights, would create new wealth and a growing voice for limiting the power of government. It is doubtful that in another 60 years there will be single-party rule in China.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sixty-years-on-china-has-prosperity-still-needs-freedom/">Sixty Years On, China Has Prosperity, Still Needs Freedom</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sixty-years-on-china-has-prosperity-still-needs-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiananmen Square: 20 Years Later</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tiananmen-square-20-years-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tiananmen-square-20-years-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James A. Dorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese communist party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights abuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiananmen Square]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=7516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By James A. Dorn</p>After 20 years China has made substantial economic progress, but the ghosts of Tiananmen are restless and will continue to be so until the Goddess of Liberty is restored. The Chinese Communist Party’s “Human Rights Action Plan” (2009–10) addresses several human rights abuses, but it fails to establish a well-defined boundary between the individual and [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tiananmen-square-20-years-later/">Tiananmen Square: 20 Years Later</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By James A. Dorn</p><p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7518" title="ts" src="http://wac.0873.edgecastcdn.net/800873/blog/wp-content/uploads/ts-300x195.jpg" alt="ts" width="300" height="195" />After 20 years China has made substantial economic progress, but the ghosts of Tiananmen are restless and will continue to be so until the Goddess of Liberty is restored.</p>
<p>The Chinese Communist Party’s “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/world/asia/15china.html">Human Rights Action Plan</a>” (2009–10) addresses several human rights abuses, but it fails to establish a well-defined boundary between the individual and the state that protects rights to life, liberty, and property.</p>
<p>Until China limits the power of the CCP and allows people to exercise their natural rights, there will be corruption, and the goal of “social harmony” will be elusive.  The lesson of Tiananmen is that the principle of nonintervention (<em>wu wei</em>) is superior to the heavy hand of the state as a way to bring about true harmony.</p>
<p>More on the Tiananmen Square massacre below.</p>
<p><object name="player" id="player" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9.0.115" width="228" height="195"><param name="movie" value="http://www.cato.org/jwmediaplayer44/player.swf"></param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"></param><param name="flashvars" value="file=http%3A%2F%2Fne.edgecastcdn.net%2F000873%2Fdailypodcast%2Fjamesadorn_tiananmensquare20yearslater_20090604.mp3&#038;image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cato.org%2Fpeople%2Fimages%2Fcdp%2Fcdp_dorn.jpg&#038;duration=324&#038;skin=http://www.cato.org/jwmediaplayer/nacht/nacht-nobutton.swf&#038;icons=false&#038;type=sound"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" width="228" height="195" src="http://www.cato.org/jwmediaplayer44/player.swf" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="file=http%3A%2F%2Fne.edgecastcdn.net%2F000873%2Fdailypodcast%2Fjamesadorn_tiananmensquare20yearslater_20090604.mp3&#038;image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cato.org%2Fpeople%2Fimages%2Fcdp%2Fcdp_dorn.jpg&#038;duration=324&#038;skin=http://www.cato.org/jwmediaplayer/nacht/nacht-nobutton.swf&#038;icons=false&#038;type=sound"></embed></param></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tiananmen-square-20-years-later/">Tiananmen Square: 20 Years Later</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tiananmen-square-20-years-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom for Yang Zili</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/freedom-for-yang-zili/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/freedom-for-yang-zili/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Boaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese communist party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f a hayek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yang Zili]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=6386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By David Boaz</p>Congratulations to Yang Zili, a Chinese advocate for political pluralism and human rights who has been set free after serving eight years in prison. As I noted in the Fall 2007 edition of Cato’s Letter, Yang was an admirer of the libertarian thinker F. A. Hayek and described himself as a political liberal. A computer engineer [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/freedom-for-yang-zili/">Freedom for Yang Zili</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By David Boaz</p><p>Congratulations to Yang Zili, a Chinese advocate for political pluralism and human rights who <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/14/world/asia/14beijing.html?_r=1">has been set free</a> after serving eight years in prison.</p>
<p>As I noted in the <a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/catosletter/catosletterv5n4.pdf">Fall 2007 edition of <em>Cato’s Letter</em></a>, Yang was an admirer of the libertarian thinker F. A. Hayek and described himself as a political liberal. A computer engineer by trade, Yang quickly recognized the power of the internet to spread ideas, founding a website, the “Garden of Ideas” (<a title="http://www.lib.126.com/" href="http://www.lib.126.com/">www.lib.126.com</a>), where he forcefully condemned communism and argued for democratic reforms. “I am a liberal,” he wrote, “and what I care about are human rights, freedom and democracy.” Yang also participated in a discussion group called the New Youth Society, where he discussed the potential for political reform in China with young people who were similarly passionate. In 2001, Yang Zili and three of his colleagues were jailed for conspiring to overthrow the Chinese Communist Party.</p>
<p>As the <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;contentId=A34768-2004Apr22&amp;notFound=true">reported</a> in 2004, the small group met for only a few months, and during that time one of its members was reporting to the Ministry of  State Security. Indeed, the Post reported:</p>
<blockquote><p>What happened to the New Youth Study Group offers a glimpse into the methods the party uses to maintain its monopoly on power and the difficult moral choices faced by those caught in its grip. The fate of the study group also illustrates the thoroughness with which the party applies one of its most basic rules of survival: Consider any independent organization a potential threat and crush it.</p>
<p>The eight members of the New Youth Study Group never agreed on a political platform and had no real source of funds. They never set up branches in other cities or recruited any other members. They never even managed to hold another meeting with full attendance; someone was always too busy.</p>
<p>And yet they attracted the attention of China&#8217;s two main security ministries. Reports about their activities reached officials at the highest levels of the party, including Luo Gan, the Politburo member responsible for internal security. Even the president then, Jiang Zemin, referred to the investigation as one of the most important in the nation, according to people who have seen an internal memo summarizing the comments of senior officials about the case.</p></blockquote>
<p>Such is life in a police state.</p>
<p>Yang Zili spent <em>eight years</em> in prison for being brave enough to speak out against an authoritarian regime, which is 8 years too many in my book. Still, we can take comfort that he got out, and that his colleagues are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/14/world/asia/14beijing.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss">slated to be released from prison next year</a>.<br />
Unfortunately, many young internet activists brave enough to stand up for freedom still <a title="http://www.freekareem.org/" href="http://www.freekareem.org/">languish in jail</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/freedom-for-yang-zili/">Freedom for Yang Zili</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/freedom-for-yang-zili/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.146 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 21:48:58 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
