<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cato @ Liberty &#187; election law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tag/election-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org</link>
	<description>Cato Institute Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.cato-at-liberty.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Monday Links</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/monday-links-27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/monday-links-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Scoville</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cato Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget negotiations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuing resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=29595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By George Scoville</p>&#8220;One of the first rules of negotiating is never to threaten to do something unless you are prepared to do it.&#8221; Policymakers and pundits assume the U.S. is so dominant that we&#8217;re prepared to fight multiple fronts at once, and that it won&#8217;t affect our security. Candidates for office should prepare to raise money, not [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/monday-links-27/">Monday Links</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By George Scoville</p><ul>
<li>&#8220;One of the first rules of negotiating is never to threaten to do something unless you are <a href="http://www.thedaily.com/page/2011/04/02/040211-opinions-oped-budget-tanner-1-2/">prepared to do it</a>.&#8221;</li>
<li>Policymakers and pundits assume the U.S. is so dominant that we&#8217;re <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52322.html">prepared to fight</a> multiple fronts at once, and that it won&#8217;t affect our security.</li>
<li>Candidates for office should <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/trevor-burrus/the-arizona-unclean-for-g_b_843534.html">prepare to raise money</a>, not rely on taxpayer subsidies.</li>
<li>More market liberalization could help <a href="http://the-diplomat.com/a-new-japan/2011/04/01/japan%E2%80%99s-economy-needs-freedom/">prepare Japan</a> for any other natural disaster.</li>
<li>Are Tea Party-backed Republicans <a href="http://www.cato.org/multimedia/daily-podcast/getting-serious-spending-cuts">prepared to go the distance</a> on spending cuts?
<p><center><iframe width="426" height="254" src="http://www.cato.org/multimedia/embed/4771" frameborder="0"></iframe></center></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/monday-links-27/">Monday Links</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/monday-links-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evo Morales&#8217; Biometric Identity System</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/evo-morales-biometric-identity-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/evo-morales-biometric-identity-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cato Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authoritarian governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerprints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president evo morales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=6747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>It was with interest and concern that I read about the new election law recently signed by Bolivian President Evo Morales. The AP reports that it &#8220;sets stricter standards for voter authentication, introducing a $30 million system of biometric identification, based on voters&#8217; fingerprints.&#8221; It is important to secure voting systems against fraud, but be [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/evo-morales-biometric-identity-system/">Evo Morales&#8217; Biometric Identity System</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p><p>It was with interest and concern that I read about the new election law recently signed by Bolivian President Evo Morales. The <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gSmmfipDiYd-s8Yrwtbg59uMxTfQD97IFO300">AP reports</a> that it &#8220;sets stricter standards for voter authentication, introducing a $30 million system of biometric identification, based on voters&#8217; fingerprints.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is important to secure voting systems against fraud, but be careful how you do it. Identity systems are powerful administrative tools which historically <a href="http://www.preventgenocide.org/prevent/removing-facilitating-factors/IDcards/">haven&#8217;t mixed well</a> with authoritarian governments.</p>
<p>A biometric voter identification system was <a href="http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=331846&amp;CategoryId=14919">apparently</a> a demand of Morales&#8217; right-wing opposition. Don&#8217;t be surprised if he uses it to consolidate power or do far worse than that to his political rivals.</p>
<p>Some advocates have dabbled in supporting a national ID in the United States for election administration, but <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/080107-tk.html">that would be error</a>. I wrote about the many risks of uniform identity systems in my book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856?tag=catoinstitute-20" ><em>Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood</em></a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/evo-morales-biometric-identity-system/">Evo Morales&#8217; Biometric Identity System</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/evo-morales-biometric-identity-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.127 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 19:09:26 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
