<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cato @ Liberty &#187; larger government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tag/larger-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org</link>
	<description>Cato Institute Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.cato-at-liberty.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Trouble in Obamaland</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/trouble-in-obamaland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/trouble-in-obamaland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Samples</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larger government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public attitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=7823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By John Samples</p>The Washington Post reports on a recent survey: The poll found little change in underlying public attitudes toward government since the inauguration, with slightly more than half saying they prefer a smaller government with fewer services to a larger government with more services. Independents, however, now split 61 to 35 percent in favor of a [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/trouble-in-obamaland/">Trouble in Obamaland</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By John Samples</p><p>The <em>Washington Post</em> <a title="WaPo on Obama" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/22/AR2009062202000.html?wpisrc=newsletter&amp;wpisrc=newsletter&amp;wpisrc=newsletter" target="_self">reports </a>on a recent survey:</p>
<blockquote><p>The poll found little change in underlying public attitudes toward government since the inauguration, with slightly more than half saying they prefer a smaller government with fewer services to a larger government with more services. Independents, however, now split 61 to 35 percent in favor of a smaller government; they were more narrowly divided on this question a year ago (52 to 44 percent), before the financial crisis hit.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Obama team probably assumes people who identify as Republicans will disapprove of  Obama&#8217;s actions sooner rather than later. Independents, however, are crucial to keeping up his public approval and thereby getting what he wants out of Congress.  On the size of government — as well as on many specific policy issues — Obama is now running counter to public opinion.</p>
<p>This may be the beginning of the end of the beginning.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/trouble-in-obamaland/">Trouble in Obamaland</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/trouble-in-obamaland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.128 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 19:47:51 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
