<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cato @ Liberty &#187; Milwaukee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tag/milwaukee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org</link>
	<description>Cato Institute Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.cato-at-liberty.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>More on Milwaukee Vouchers</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/more-on-milwaukee-vouchers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/more-on-milwaukee-vouchers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew J. Coulson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education and Child Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee voucher program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voucher program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vouchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=13154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew J. Coulson</p>Joseph Lawler and Philip Klein of the American Spectator have some helpful comments on my earlier post about the misunderstanding and misrepresentation of a recent report on Milwaukee&#8217;s voucher program. I had stated that the city&#8217;s public schools cost taxpayers about 50% more than the voucher program, and Lawler and Klein note that it&#8217;s really more like 100%. [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/more-on-milwaukee-vouchers/">More on Milwaukee Vouchers</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew J. Coulson</p><p><a href="http://spectator.org/blog/2010/04/15/the-failure-of-school-vouchers">Joseph Lawler</a> and <a href="http://spectator.org/blog/2010/04/15/re-milwaukee-school-vouchers">Philip Klein</a> of the <em>American Spectator</em> have some helpful comments on my earlier post about the misunderstanding and misrepresentation of a recent report on Milwaukee&#8217;s voucher program. I had stated that the city&#8217;s public schools cost taxpayers about 50% more than the voucher program, and Lawler and Klein note that it&#8217;s really more like 100%. They&#8217;re right. The approved <a href="http://www2.milwaukee.k12.wi.us/portal/FY10AdoptedAmdBudget.pdf">FY2010 budget is $1.073 billion</a> and <a href="http://mpsportal.milwaukee.k12.wi.us/portal/server.pt?open=512&amp;objID=367&amp;mode=2&amp;in_hi_userid=2&amp;cached=true">enrollment is 82,444</a> &#8212; for a per pupil figure of just over $13,000/pupil. The voucher is worth only $6,607.</p>
<p>My mistake was to rely on my recollection of the MPS spending figure used in a <a href="http://www.uark.edu/ua/der/SCDP/Milwaukee_Eval/Report_07.pdf">2009 fiscal impact analysis</a> of the voucher program, which turns out not to have included all the district&#8217;s revenue sources.  </p>
<p>But while I&#8217;m following up on this, I&#8217;d like to re-emphasize the final point of my earlier post, to which the <em>Spectator</em> writers did not draw particular attention: <em>the Milwaukee voucher program is not a test of free market education</em>. As I noted earlier, its total enrollment is legislatively limited to about 20,000 students, and in the past that limit was much lower. Additionally, there is a rigid price control on voucher schools &#8212; the voucher must be accepted as full payment, <em>even though it is worth only half as much as public schools spend per pupil</em>.</p>
<p>Think carefully about this. What entrepreneur would enter an industry whose total customer base is confined to a few thousand families in a single U.S. city and which has a rigid price control set at half the spending level of a government protected monopoly operating in that same city?</p>
<p>That is not test of market forces.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/more-on-milwaukee-vouchers/">More on Milwaukee Vouchers</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/more-on-milwaukee-vouchers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failures in Ed. Policy Analysis&#8212;Misunderstanding Milwaukee</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/failures-in-ed-policy-analysismisunderstanding-milwaukee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/failures-in-ed-policy-analysismisunderstanding-milwaukee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew J. Coulson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education and Child Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Yglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee voucher program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public school students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voucher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vouchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=13091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew J. Coulson</p>To the extent education policy commentary actually affects policy, it has the potential to do great good or great harm. Several recent commentaries in this field fall into the latter camp, and it&#8217;s important to understand why &#8212; so that we can avoid similar mistakes in future. The one I&#8217;ll discuss here is this blog post [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/failures-in-ed-policy-analysismisunderstanding-milwaukee/">Failures in Ed. Policy Analysis&mdash;Misunderstanding Milwaukee</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew J. Coulson</p><p>To the extent education policy commentary actually affects policy, it has the potential to do great good or great harm. Several recent commentaries in this field fall into the latter camp, and it&#8217;s important to understand why &#8212; so that we can avoid similar mistakes in future.</p>
<p>The one I&#8217;ll discuss here is this <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/04/the-milwaukee-voucher-failure.php">blog post by Matthew Yglesias</a>, in which he draws broad conclusions about the functioning of education markets from a recent study of a tiny <a href="http://www.uark.edu/ua/der/SCDP/Milwaukee_Research.html">school choice program in Milwaukee </a>as well as from some older unspecified research [for the latter, Yglesias <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_verdict_on_vouchers">linked here</a>, but the body of that page doesn't discuss school choice]. The Milwaukee study is part of a vast literature. Over the past quarter century at least <em>sixty-five</em> studies have compared outcomes in public and private schools around the world, reporting <em><a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/articles/coulson_comparing_public_private_market_schools_jsc.pdf">156 separate statistical findings</a></em>.</p>
<p>The evidence of this literature is starkly one-sided. The vast preponderance of findings show private schools outperforming public schools after all the normal controls. What&#8217;s more, when we focus on the research comparing truly market-like systems to state-run school monopolies, the market advantage is found to be even more dramatic (see Figure 2 in the paper linked above). To draw policy opinions from a small, selective handful of those studies while ignoring the rest is policy malpractice, and it is dangerous to children.</p>
<p>Even the recent Milwaukee result described by Yglesias as a failure shows voucher students in private schools performing as well as public school students who receive roughly 50% more government funding. How is a program that produces similar academic results to the status quo at a much lower cost to taxpayers a failure? And what of the research suggesting that <a href="http://www.schoolchoicewi.org/data/currdev_links/2010-Grad-Study-1-31-2010.pdf">students in the Milwaukee voucher program graduate at higher rates</a> than those in public schools?</p>
<p>More importantly from a long term policy perspective, how is a program limited to 20,000 or so children in a single city, being served almost entirely by non-profit entities, a test of market education? Would Apple have spent hundreds of millions developing the iPhone or the iPad if its market were limited to the same customer base? Of course not. The dynamism, diversity and innovation we have come to expect from competitive markets in other fields relies on the prospect of ultimately scaling up to serve mass audiences. Without the prospect of a large-scale <em>return</em> on investment, there is no incentive to invest in the first place.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/failures-in-ed-policy-analysismisunderstanding-milwaukee/">Failures in Ed. Policy Analysis&mdash;Misunderstanding Milwaukee</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/failures-in-ed-policy-analysismisunderstanding-milwaukee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Dialogue on School Choice, Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-dialogue-on-school-choice-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-dialogue-on-school-choice-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew J. Coulson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education and Child Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curriculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[educational freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low income families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naacp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pupil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rev. Joe Darby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=7300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew J. Coulson</p>A tax credit bill was recently proposed in South Carolina to give parents an easier choice between public and private schools. It would do this by cutting taxes on parents who pay for their own children&#8217;s education, and by cutting taxes on anyone who donates to a non-profit Scholarship Granting Organization (SGO). The SGOs would [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-dialogue-on-school-choice-part-4/">A Dialogue on School Choice, Part 4</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew J. Coulson</p><p>A  tax credit bill was recently proposed in South Carolina to give parents an  easier choice between public and private schools. It would do this by cutting  taxes on parents who pay for their own children&rsquo;s education, and by cutting  taxes on anyone who donates to a non-profit Scholarship Granting Organization  (SGO). The SGOs would subsidize tuition for low income families (who owe little  in taxes and so couldn&rsquo;t benefit substantially from the direct tax credit).  Charleston minister Rev. Joseph Darby opposes such programs, and I support  them. We&rsquo;ve decided to have this dialogue to explain why. Our closing comments  appear below, and the previous installments are <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/05/12/a-dialogue-on-school-choice/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/05/13/a-dialogue-on-school-choice-part-2/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/05/15/a-dialogue-on-school-choice-part-3/">here</a>.</p>
<hr />
<div style="float: right; width: 47%;">
<div style="float: right; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 20px; width: 110px;"><img title="Rev. Darby" src="http://www.cato.org/images/homepage/darby_coulson2.jpg" alt="Rev. Darby" width="100" /> <strong>Rev. Joe Darby</strong></div>
<h3>Closing Comment </h3>
<p>Thanks  for the research and references, Andrew, but I don&rsquo;t live in Milwaukee, Africa  or India &#8211; I live and grew up in South Carolina, and I remember when my state  resisted desegregation. I remember the news reports, white protests and  rhetoric about new private schools, where white children would be  &quot;safe.&quot; Attorney Tom Turnipseed, a repentant racist in Columbia, SC,  fought to create those schools and now willingly admits his prejudiced  motivation for doing so. That legacy needs to be acknowledged and those schools  need to demonstrate that they&rsquo;ve changed before many citizens will be  comfortable with them.</p>
<p>Many  white parents who didn&rsquo;t send their children to private schools in those days  simply couldn&rsquo;t afford to do so without governmental assistance. An irony of  American racism is that poor whites have also suffered, but have been  culturally conditioned to not collaborate with or trust those of other colors  who have common interests.</p>
<p>Having  said that, let me keep my promise from my last installment of our dialogue. You  noted that some private school parents of modest means have found ways to  augment government funding for things like transportation and uniforms. I said  that I wasn&rsquo;t surprised, because good parents will go to great lengths for  their children&rsquo;s well being &#8211; and have done so for years without public funding  of private schools. My wife and I did so when we were young, struggling  parents.</p>
<p>Our  sons attended V.V. Reid Kindergarten and Day Care in Columbia, SC &#8211; a 54 year  old private facility sponsored by Reid Chapel AME Church. That predominately  black school has a reputation for excellence and a long waiting list, and now  includes an elementary school. The tuition was &#8211; and still is &#8211; considerable,  but we paid it as a matter of parental choice. They also attended and graduated  from public elementary, middle and high schools &#8211; now labeled as  &quot;failing&quot; &#8211; and are now very successful men. They attended V.V. Reid  with the children of physicians and attorneys and the children of janitors and  cooks, but all of those children had one thing in common &#8211; their parents paid &#8211;  and still pay &#8211; the full tuition. V.V. Reid does not accept any government  funds and the current pastor, Rev. Norvell Goff, says that they aren&rsquo;t seeking  governmental funding and don&rsquo;t support tuition tax credits and scholarships. As  Rev. Goff said, &quot;Parents who care will pay the price.&quot;</p>
<p>That  points to what most puzzles me about the fight to give private schools public  money, allegedly to educate needy children. The idea&rsquo;s most consistently  strident uncompensated supporters in South Carolina are not those of modest  means or progressive political mind set, but conservative legislators and  interest groups who usually tell the needy to pull themselves up by their  &quot;bootstraps&quot; and consistently oppose what they call  &quot;handouts&quot; or &quot;pork&quot; for struggling communities. From  health care to infrastructure to housing, they condemn governmental involvement  in the private sector, but they make a remarkable exception for education.  Could they have had a miraculous social epiphany on education, or could they  possibly see a financial and social benefit for their constituents and  neighbors that wouldn&rsquo;t be rhetorically prudent in &quot;selling&quot;  privatization to struggling families?</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ll  conclude our dialogue with that question, with thanksgiving that a bipartisan,  biracial majority of our Senators killed South Carolina&rsquo;s current privatization  legislation last week, and with the wise and true words of SC Education  Secretary Jim Rex &#8211; when businesses consider locating in South Carolina, they  never ask, &quot;How are your private schools.&quot; Public education does  matter. I&rsquo;m also sure the issue isn&rsquo;t entirely dead, so be blessed, take care,  and we&rsquo;ll chat next year.</p>
<p>***  </p>
<p>The Rev. Darby is senior pastor of the AME Morris Brown Church in Charleston, and First Vice President of the Charleston Branch of the NAACP.</p>
</div>
<div style="float: left; width: 47%;">
<div style="float: left; margin-bottom: 20px; width: 110px; margin-right: 20px;"><img title="Andrew Coulson" src="http://www.cato.org/people/images/lowres/coulson.jpg" alt="Andrew Coulson" width="100" height="151" /> <strong>Andrew Coulson</strong></div>
<h3>Closing Comment </h3>
<p>You wrote that &quot;dangerous  buildings can&#8230; be expeditiously made excellent and secure while occupied and  before they catch fire&#8230;. The chronic inequities in public education can be  expeditiously addressed with will and commitment.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;<em>Before</em> they catch fire&quot;? Nearly half of all children in South  Carolina <a href="http://www.edweek.org/media/ew/dc/2008/40sgb.sc.h27.pdf">drop  out before finishing high school</a>. Nearly HALF! Public schooling is burning  NOW. It&#8217;s been ablaze for decades, reducing countless children&#8217;s dreams to ashes.  Having another meeting to discuss fire codes would be madness. We need to get a  ladder to these kids <em>today</em>.</p>
<p>And &quot;fixed expeditiously  with will and commitment&quot;? Spending per pupil has more than doubled in  real terms over the past forty years. Two generations of would-be reformers  have worked feverishly to improve the system, passing one education bill after  another at the state and federal levels, and introducing countless revisions to  the curriculum and teacher training policies. Class sizes have been reduced,  teachers&#8217; salaries have been raised. Short of ritual sacrifices, there is  nothing that has not already been tried, repeatedly, to fix the public schools.<br />
  You wrote that &quot;studies on the  success of privatization&#8230; are a &#8216;wash&#8217; &#8212; each of us can find support for our  positions.&quot; This is simply not true. As I&#8217;ve noted, the research findings  comparing market to monopoly schooling all over the world <em><a href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a909856259~db=all">favor  markets by a margin of 15 to 1</a></em>. That&#8217;s based on the most comprehensive  literature review to date. Social science, while imperfect, <em>is</em> science. And on this point, it is  unambiguous.</p>
<p>As  for your statement that South Carolina significantly and systematically  underfunds rural black districts along the I-95 corridor, I decided to check it  out. Using this year&#8217;s data from South Carolina&#8217;s <a href="http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess117_2007-2008/appropriations2008/tap1b.htm">General  Appropriations spending bill</a>, I calculated the average expenditure per  pupil: $11,815. For rural districts along the I-95 corridor, it comes to $11,743  &#8212; a difference of $72. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve  said that, in the wake of the civil war, some middle-class blacks excluded  lower-class blacks from their private schools. If that&#8217;s true, I would  certainly join you in lamenting their behavior. But who is guilty of this  cruelty today? Who is currently trying to keep poor young blacks from getting easier  access to private schools? The NAACP supports scholarships for low-income students  to attend private colleges, but fiercely opposes the same practice at the  elementary and high school levels. Who&#8217;s blocking the schoolhouse door now?</p>
<p>Fortunately,  school choice is advancing despite such misguided opposition. There are dozens  of choice programs around the nation, and the best among them are growing  rapidly and with bi-partisan support. Some black leaders of your own  generation, such as South Carolina Senator Robert Ford, have gotten on board.  Even more of <a href="http://content.usatoday.net/dist/custom/gci/InsidePage.aspx?cId=ozarksnow&#038;sParam=35033066.story">the  next generation of black leaders</a>, from Corey Booker in New Jersey to Kevin  Johnson in Sacramento, are on board as well. And some of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V34kYMm82oo">the most eloquent voices</a> in support of educational freedom are beneficiaries of school choice.</p>
<p>Perhaps,  if you talk with some of the tens of thousands of families benefitting from  school choice around the country, you&#8217;ll be convinced to join them aboard the  educational freedom train. It&#8217;s pulling out of the station regardless.</p>
<p>In  closing, I&#8217;d like to thank you for participating in this exchange. I hope  people on all sides of the debate have found it useful.</p>
<p>***  </p>
<p>Andrew Coulson is director of the Cato Institute&#8217;s Center for Educational Freedom, and author of <em><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3xi49dmYw0wC&#038;printsec=frontcover&#038;dq=market+education">Market Education: The Unknown History</a></em>.</p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-dialogue-on-school-choice-part-4/">A Dialogue on School Choice, Part 4</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-dialogue-on-school-choice-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women&#8217;s Suffrage Abandoned. &#8220;Too Unpopular,&#8221; says Anthony.</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/womens-suffrage-abandoned-too-unpopular-says-anthony/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/womens-suffrage-abandoned-too-unpopular-says-anthony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew J. Coulson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education and Child Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[educational freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school choice programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan b anthony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vouchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=6449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew J. Coulson</p>Reversing his earlier support for private school choice in the District of Columbia, Washington Post columnist Jay Mathews now calls for the end of the DC Opportunity Scholarship program. Why? &#8220;Vouchers help [low income] kids, but not enough of them. The vouchers are too at odds with the general public view of education. They don&#8217;t have much [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/womens-suffrage-abandoned-too-unpopular-says-anthony/">Women&#8217;s Suffrage Abandoned. &#8220;Too Unpopular,&#8221; says Anthony.</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew J. Coulson</p><p>Reversing his earlier support for private school choice in the District of Columbia, <em>Washington Post</em> columnist <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/22/AR2009032201628.html">Jay Mathews now calls for the end of the DC Opportunity Scholarship program</a>. Why? &#8220;Vouchers help [low income] kids, but not enough of them. The vouchers are too at odds with the general public view of education. They don&#8217;t have much of a future.&#8221;</p>
<p>So private school choice programs work, but because they are not growing quite fast enough for Mr. Mathews&#8217; taste we should abandon the entire enterprise? Why keep striving for total victory when can seize defeat today!</p>
<p>The thing is, major social changes are usually, what&#8217;s the word&#8230; oh yes: <em>hard</em>. Susan B. Anthony co-founded the National Women&#8217;s Suffrage Association in 1869. She died in 1906 &#8211; 14 years, 5 months and five days before passage of the <a title="Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteenth_Amendment_to_the_U.S._Constitution">19th Amendment</a>. If a social reform is right and just, it will inspire reformers who will fight for it every bit as long as it takes.</p>
<p>And even those who decide what social reforms to support based on their popularity should take note that school choice programs are proliferating all over the country. And newer tax credit programs, such as Florida&#8217;s, Pennsylvania&#8217;s, and Arizona&#8217;s, are all growing at a faster rate than older voucher programs like the one in Milwaukee. More than that, the politics of school choice have already begun to change at the state level. While Democrats in Congress had no qualms slipping a shiv into the futures of 1,700 poor kids, <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/03/23/this-is-system-failure/">more and more of their fellow party members at the state level are deciding to back educational freedom</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/womens-suffrage-abandoned-too-unpopular-says-anthony/">Women&#8217;s Suffrage Abandoned. &#8220;Too Unpopular,&#8221; says Anthony.</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/womens-suffrage-abandoned-too-unpopular-says-anthony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.436 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 19:57:15 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
