<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cato @ Liberty &#187; princeton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tag/princeton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org</link>
	<description>Cato Institute Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.cato-at-liberty.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>A Federal Takeover of Cyber Security?</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-federal-takeover-of-cyber-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-federal-takeover-of-cyber-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=6320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>One hopes not. But the White House&#8217;s 60-day review of cyber security, ongoing now, could set the stage for it. In a TechKnowledge piece out today, I argue against federal responsibility for private cyber security. A common law liability regime is the best route to discovering and patching security flaws in all the implements of [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-federal-takeover-of-cyber-security/">A Federal Takeover of Cyber Security?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p><p>One hopes not. But the White House&#8217;s 60-day review of cyber security, ongoing now, could set the stage for it.</p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/090313-tk.html"><em>TechKnowledge</em> piece</a> out today, I argue against federal responsibility for private cyber security. A common law liability regime is the best route to discovering and patching security flaws in all the implements of our information economy and society.</p>
<p>The smarties at the Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton recently <a href="http://citp.princeton.edu/blog/2009/02/27/conversation-debugging-our-cyber-security-policy/">sat down to discuss these issues too</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-federal-takeover-of-cyber-security/">A Federal Takeover of Cyber Security?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-federal-takeover-of-cyber-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.107 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 18:29:10 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
