<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cato @ Liberty &#187; skilled workers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/tag/skilled-workers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org</link>
	<description>Cato Institute Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.cato-at-liberty.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>The Federal Solution to Illegal Immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-federal-solution-to-illegal-immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-federal-solution-to-illegal-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Griswold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comprehensive immigration reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skilled workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=13733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Griswold</p>A silver lining of the Arizona immigration law is that is has turned up the heat on Washington to re-examine federal policy. As I’ve made the rounds of talk radio shows today, one of the questions that keeps coming up is just what changes should be made in federal law to tackle illegal immigration. Glad [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-federal-solution-to-illegal-immigration/">The Federal Solution to Illegal Immigration</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Griswold</p><p>A silver lining of the Arizona immigration law is that is has turned up the heat on Washington to re-examine federal policy. As I’ve made the rounds of talk radio shows today, one of the questions that keeps coming up is just what changes should be made in federal law to tackle illegal immigration. Glad you asked.</p>
<p>In brief, the single most effective change would be to expand opportunities for legal immigration, including for low-skilled workers who make up the large majority of the illegal population.</p>
<p>I make the case for comprehensive immigration reform in <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100427_U_S__needs_to_let_more_workers_in.html">an op-ed in today’s <em>Philadelphia Inquirer</em></a>.</p>
<p>For a more comprehensive case for comprehensive reform, see the lead article I wrote for the current issue of the <em>Albany Government Law Review</em>, titled <a href="http://www.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/sub.php?id=14">“Comprehensive Immigration Reform: What Congress and the President Need to do to Make It Work.”</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-federal-solution-to-illegal-immigration/">The Federal Solution to Illegal Immigration</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-federal-solution-to-illegal-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Democrats Serious about Immigration Reform?</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/are-democrats-serious-about-immigration-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/are-democrats-serious-about-immigration-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Griswold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afl cio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guest worker program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration reform and control act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latin america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skilled workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=7853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Griswold</p>President Obama is meeting today with a bipartisan group of lawmakers to talk about reforming our broken immigration system. The challenge for both parties will be whether they can overcome opposition within their respective bases to expanding legal immigration. For Republicans, the chief opposition remains the faction of talk-radio-driven conservatives who just don’t like immigration, [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/are-democrats-serious-about-immigration-reform/">Are Democrats Serious about Immigration Reform?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Griswold</p><p>President Obama is meeting today with a bipartisan group of lawmakers to talk about reforming our broken immigration system. The challenge for both parties will be whether they can overcome opposition within their respective bases to expanding legal immigration.</p>
<p>For Republicans, the chief opposition remains the faction of talk-radio-driven conservatives who just don’t like immigration, period, especially when it comes from Latin America. For Democrats, who now run Washington, the chief opposition to allowing more foreign workers to enter the country legally is represented by organized labor.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124589025790951081.html">the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reports</a> this morning, advocates of immigration reform “worry that Democrats will defer to the AFL-CIO on the issue of legal immigration. The labor confederation has opposed a robust guest-worker program or higher levels of legal immigration, fearing they would depress wages. A larger labor presence would splinter the coalition of business and pro-immigration groups that embraced past immigration efforts, only to see them falter in the Senate.”</p>
<p>As I’ve <a href="http://www.freetrade.org/node/661">argued consistently</a> in the past, immigration reform is not worth pursuing if it does not include expanding future flows of legal immigrants, both highly skilled and lower-skilled workers.  If Congress confines itself to legalizing the 8 million or so workers already here illegally, with a vow to get tougher on enforcement, then we are just repeating the mistake of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act.</p>
<p>We will know if President Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress are serious about fixing the problem of illegal immigration if they face down their labor-union allies and embrace a workable, market-oriented expansion of legal immigration. Otherwise, we are in for more futility, frustration and failure.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/are-democrats-serious-about-immigration-reform/">Are Democrats Serious about Immigration Reform?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/are-democrats-serious-about-immigration-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.123 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 20:27:58 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
